REQUEST QUOTE

Supreme Court to Hear Health Care Reform Arguments in March

January 17th, 2012 | News

The Supreme Court will hear arguments in March about the health care overhaul, setting up an election year showdown. The decision to hear arguments in the spring allows plenty of time for a decision in late June, just over four months before Election Day.

The health care case could be the high court’s most significant political undertaking since the 5-4 decision in Bush v. Gore nearly 11 years ago. That ruling effectively sealed George W. Bush’s 2000 presidential election victory.

The court has scheduled a remarkable five and one-half hours for oral arguments in the case, but has not set a specific date. The court will hear two hours’ worth of arguments about the so-called “individual mandate,” a linchpin of the law that requires individuals to have health insurance or face a penalty.

The court will also evaluate the provision’s constitutionality and whether the overall health care law can still stand even if that provision doesn’t.

Other portions of the oral arguments include the law’s new Medicaid requirements for states, and whether it is proper for courts to hear challenges to the law, considering its mandates do not take effect until 2014.

Source: NBC News, 12/19/11

Plummer Insurance Acquires Nerud Agency

January 11th, 2012 | News

Plummer Insurance is proud to announce the acquisition of Jack Nerud Insurance Agency of Oshkosh, Nebraska, effective January 1, 2012.

The Nerud Agency (located at 210 Main Street) has provided insurance services to the Oshkosh area since 1959.  Previous owners Jack and Barbara Nerud operated both an insurance agency and a real estate business at the 210 Main location.  Recently, the Neruds have decided to retire from the insurance agency and focus exclusively on the real estate portion of their business.
.
The acquisition adds a second location to Plummer Insurance, which will still be headquartered in Bridgeport.  The Oshkosh location, managed by Andrew Plummer, offers all of the same insurance products the Bridgeport location provides, including home, auto, commercial, health, life, crop, farm, and many other specialty lines.
.
The agency will be open Monday – Wednesday from 8:00 AM – 5:00 PM and can be reached at (308) 772.3008.

Supreme Court to Hear Challenges to Health Law

November 16th, 2011 | News

 

Copyright:  (c) 2011 A.M. Best Company, Inc.
Source:  A.M. Best Company, Inc.
   


The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a legal challenge to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, setting the stage for one of the most closely watched cases to reach the high court in recent years.

The Supreme Court’s decision to accept the case was not surprising, given that several federal appellate courts have handed down opinions on the health care reform law that differed dramatically from one another. But what was unusual was the justices setting aside five and a half hours for oral arguments on the case. Typically, the Supreme Court allots 30 minutes to each side for each case. The arguments in the PPACA case are likely to be scheduled for early next year, with a decision coming in late June — in the middle of the final months of the 2012 election campaign.

The justices did not, however, agree to hear arguments on all of the issues raised in appeals filed by the Obama administration, 26 states and a business trade group. The majority of the oral argument time will be devoted to whether the PPACA’s key provision — the individual mandate that requires all Americans to purchase health insurance — is constitutional and whether the individual mandate can be struck down while allowing other portions of the law to stand.

The justices also agreed to hear arguments on whether the Anti-Injunction Act bars some or all of the challenges to the insurance mandate and the constitutionality of the expansion of the Medicaid program for the poor and disabled.

The Supreme Court’s decision to grant certiorari came after the Obama administration and 26 states suing to block the health reform law asked the justices to take up a decision out of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit decision that determined the individual mandate was unconstitutional. That court also overturned a January district court decision that the mandate was not severable from the act. The National Federation of Independent Business, a party to the multistate lawsuit, filed a separate petition asking for the district court’s severability determination to be upheld and the entire law rejected as a result.

The questions that are now before the Supreme Court have already been put before federal appellate courts, which have largely split on how they should be answered. In the latest decision related to the PPACA, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected a challenge to the federal health reform law’s individual mandate to carry insurance, with a Reagan appointee writing the majority opinion (Best’s News Service, Nov. 8, 2011).

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit rejected arguments from both the plaintiff, Liberty University, and the Justice Department that the Anti-Injunction Act should not apply to the PPACA penalty (Best’s News Service, Oct. 11, 2011).

And Virginia asked for reconsideration of an appeals court dismissal of its right to challenge the law in federal court based on a state law enacted to block the individual mandate. The 4th Circuit ruled the mandate imposed no burden on the state, just individuals, and therefore a state has no basis to intervene (Best’s News Service, Oct. 3, 2011).

While the constitutionality of the PPACA and its individual mandate is still in question until the Supreme Court issues a decision, several states have moved to protest the law by way of legislation and ballot measures.

On Nov. 8, Ohio voters overwhelmingly approved an amendment to the state’s constitution that would prohibit laws requiring Ohio residents to participate in the state’s health care system; laws that require residents to purchase health insurance; and laws that fine residents for failing to purchase health insurance (Best’s News Service, Nov. 9, 2011). Arizona, Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma have taken similar steps.

But in practice, those legislative protests of the PPACA may not have any immediate effect on the question of whether individuals can be required to buy health insurance. Because state law is superseded by federal law under the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate will override any state laws seeking to take a different approach.

Obama Deficit Plan Targets Farm Subsidies, Crop Insurance

September 20th, 2011 | News

By Reuters September 20, 2011

President Barack Obama on Monday proposed to end a “direct payment” subsidy that gives $5 billion a year to farmers regardless of need, as part of his larger effort to reduce the federal budget deficit.

Direct payments, created in 1996 as a temporary measure, will be the largest farm subsidy this year and terminating them would be a dramatic re-shaping of the U.S. farm program.

Traditional price support programs, which are triggered by low grain prices, are idle this year because of record high crop prices.

Opponents of the direct payments say they help bankroll large operators who out-bid small and medium-size growers for land and equipment. Defenders say the payments are one leg of a federal tripod that stabilizes the farm sector

The White House said the subsidy is “unnecessary” as more than half of recipients have incomes above $100,000 a year. In a blog, White House rural advisor Doug McKalip said elimination of the subsidy was common-sense reform.

Elimination of direct payments would save $30 billion over a decade and crop insurance reforms would save $8.3 billion, said the White House. It also suggested cuts of $2 billion in stewardship programs and renewal of a disaster program that expires on Oct 1 for net savings of $33 billion.

Republican farm-state lawmakers said Obama should have looked at land stewardship and public nutrition programs rather than proposing hefty cuts to farm and crop insurance subsidies.

“For example, cutting $8 billion from crop insurance puts the entire program at risk,” said House Agriculture Committee chairman Frank Lucas of Oklahoma and Kansas Sen Pat Roberts, Republican leader on the Senate Agriculture Committee.

Discussion of farm reform usually is put off until a new farm law is being written. But the congressional drive for large savings could force earlier-than-usual debate.

Direct payments were tabbed months ago as a target for reduction or elimination. Some farm groups hope to shift money from the payments into programs that compensate farm losses.

“We think the program is politically vulnerable,” said analyst Mark McMinimy of MF Global. “But just how the program may be altered and how quickly changes will go into effect are still very much open questions.”

The National Corn Growers said it was concerned the cuts would undermine farmers’ ability to buy crop insurance to offset high and volatile market prices.

“While direct payments may be impacted, we are going to find a way to have a safety net in place,” said Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to the National Restaurant Association.

The government pays roughly 60 percent of the premium for crop insurance. The White House would reduce the subsidy by two basis points on policies with a federal subsidy above 50 percent, for savings estimated at $2 billion.

More than 90 percent of policyholders opt for higher levels of coverage.

The White House also would lower the rate of return to insurers to 12 percent, from the current 14 percent, to save $2 billion. It would cap administrative expenses at $900 million a year, adjusted for inflation, to save $3.7 billion, and set the premium for catastrophic coverage more accurately, saving $600 million.

Senate Budget Committee chairman Kent Conrad said Obama asked “for larger agriculture cuts than are necessary or appropriate” and could impair drafting of the 2012 farm law.

Without the direct payment, the budget for farm supports would be half or less than current spending.

copyright Reuters 2011

(Reporting by Charles Abbott; Editing by Bob Burgdorfer)

EMC Voting Begins Today

July 1st, 2011 | News

Beginning today, July 1st, 2011, people can go on-line to EMC’s Website and click “Vote Now” to begin voting for their favorite charity. Voting will last 100 days and will end on October 8. Voters are allowed to vote once each day until voting closes. At the end of the 100 day voting period, the four non-profits with the highest combined scores from the public and the EMC Foundation will receive an additional $25,000. We encourage each of you to go on-line in July show your support for the Morrill County Community Hospital Foundation.

To learn more about the 100 Ways of Giving, visit The Official Press Release or log on to http://morrillcountyhospital.com/ or www.countonEMC.com.  Thank you!

Morrill County Hospital Foundation Beneficiary of Grant

June 9th, 2011 | News

On June 7, the Morrill County Hospital Foundation was presented a grant for $1,000.00 from EMC Insurance Company and the EMC Insurance Foundation. The Foundation was nominated by Plummer Insurance, Inc. as one of only 100 nonprofit organizations across the country to receive a grant. This campaign is designed to help EMC celebrate its 100th Anniversary and to support those communities which have been very important to EMC Insurance Companies over the years. Plummer Insurance, Inc. is one of only four agencies in the Omaha Branch, consisting of over 200 agents, to receive this priviledge.
 
In addition to this grant, four of these nonprofits are eligible to be awarded $25,000 this fall in the next phase of the 100 Ways of Giving campaign. Starting July 1, people can go on-line to www.CountonEMC.com and vote for their favorite charity. Voting will last 100 days and will end on October 8. Voters are allowed to vote once each day until voting closes. At the end of the 100 day voting period, the four non-profits with the highest combined scores from the public and the EMC Foundation will receive an additional $25,000. We encourage each of you to go on-line in July show your support for the Morrill County Community Hospital Foundation.

Medicare To Be Broke By 2024, Report Says

June 3rd, 2011 | News

The bad economy is worsening the already-shaky finances of Medicare and Social Security, draining the trust funds supporting them faster than expected and intensifying the need for Congress to shore up the benefit programs, the government said yesterday.

Both Medicare and Social Security are being hit by a double whammy: the long-anticipated wave of retiring baby boomers and weaker-than-expected tax receipts, according to the annual report by the trustees who oversee the programs.

The Medicare hospital insurance fund for seniors is now projected to run out of money in 2024, five years earlier than last year’s estimate. The Social Security trust funds are projected to be drained in 2036, one year earlier than the last estimate. Once the trust funds are exhausted, both programs can only collect enough money in payroll taxes to pay partial benefits, the report said.

Copyright:  (c) 2011 ProQuest Information and Learning Company; All Rights Reserved.
Source:  Proquest LLC

Most Without Insurance Do Not Pay Hospital Bills: Federal Report

May 10th, 2011 | News

May 10, 2011

Written by: Insurance Journal

Few families without health insurance have the financial assets to pay potential hospital bills. On average, uninsured families can only afford to pay in full for approximately 12 percent of hospital stays they may experience – and even higher-income uninsured families are unable to pay for most potential hospital stays, according to a report by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

Hospital stays for which the uninsured cannot pay in full account for 95 percent of the total amount hospitals bill the uninsured. Other studies have estimated that the bills for all types of health care that the uninsured cannot pay – the uncompensated cost of care – is up to $73 billion a year, a significant portion of which is shifted into higher costs for Americans with insurance and their employers, according to HHS.

The report found that most of the country’s 50 million uninsured people have virtually no savings. In fact, the median financial assets for all uninsured families are just $20. Even among higher-income families, assets are low. Half of families with income at 400 percent of the federal poverty level, or $89,400 a year for a family of four in 2011, have financial assets below $4,100.

Every year, nearly two million uninsured Americans are hospitalized. With 58 percent of these hospital stays resulting in bills of more than $10,000, most uninsured people are unable to afford potential hospital bills. The report found that even the top 10 percent of uninsured families with the most assets are estimated to be able to pay the full bill for only half of potential hospital stays. Uninsured families can, on average, afford to pay the full bills for only about 12 percent of the hospital stays they might experience, bills that account for just 5 percent of the total amount hospitals bill them.

“Health insurance is critical in helping protect families from unexpected hospital costs,” said Sherry Glied, HHS assistant secretary for planning and evaluation. “This report shows that even higher-income uninsured families are struggling to meet the high costs of health care. No family should bear the burden of being one illness or accident away from bankruptcy.”

According to the report, the high cost of hospitalization means that lacking health insurance poses a greater risk of financial catastrophe than lacking car insurance or homeowner’s insurance. Although people are 50 percent more likely to have a car accident than to be hospitalized in a given year, the average bill for a hospital visit is more than two and a half times higher than the average loss for a car accident. While the bill for a single hospitalization is about the same as the average loss from a house fire, a person is 10 times more likely to be hospitalized than to experience a house fire.

10 Tips For Getting The Lowest Car Insurance

March 11th, 2011 | News

Mar. 11 2011 – 9:47 am

Buying your first car is a pleasurable rite of passage for most people, but the accompanying purchase of auto insurance is less fun. In fact, many new car owners find the cost of insurance frustratingly high and so do individuals who have had car insurance for decades.

While competing car insurance companies offer opportunities for discounts, individuals can also take steps before they buy a car to make sure they will pay the lowest possible premiums.

  •  Compare Rates for Various Cars
    Once you have identified two or three cars that you think you can afford and will fulfill your needs, call your (agent) to compare premiums for the cars. Car insurance costs vary because of the safety record, repair costs and likelihood of theft as well as the price of the car.
  •  

  •  Avoid Gaps in Coverage
    If you are switching policies, make sure you are completely covered at all times. If you let your insurance coverage lapse by forgetting to make the premium payments, your rates are likely to be increased.   
  •  Maintain Good Credit
    Insurance companies typically check your credit score when determining your insurance rates because they have found a correlation between bad credit and the likelihood of making a claim.   
  •  Drive Less
    Many companies offer a low-mileage discount for drivers who have a short commute or drive few miles each year.   
  •  Request a High Deductible
    One of the easiest ways to reduce your car insurance premiums is to increase your deductible. Just make sure you have the funds to pay the deductible if you get in an accident.
  •  

  •  Claim all Your Discounts
    If your car has extra anti-theft or safety features such as anti-lock brakes, most insurance companies will give you a discount on your premiums. You may also be eligible for a discount if you have taken a defensive driving class or, if you are a student, you have good grades.   
  •  Drive Safely
    Of course you should drive carefully to avoid accidents and tickets anyway, but bad driving can also raise your insurance rates or even lead to a nonrenewal of your policy. While too many speeding tickets can cause a problem, causing an accident will typically raise your insurance costs by as much as 40%.
  •  

  •  Consider Moving
    While this may be a bit drastic, auto insurance rates vary widely from one location to another because of the likelihood of an accident or a theft. In general, car insurance rates are lower in rural areas, so you may want to look into the potential for higher or lower insurance rates if you are thinking of moving.   
  •  Work with One Insurance Company
    After you shop around for insurance rates, choose one company for all your insurance needs. Most offer a discount for combining car and homeowners or renters insurance with one provider. (Before paying for coverage, find out what you need to do to ensure you get paid. See What To Do If Your Insurance Won’t Pay.)   
  •  Lower Your Coverage
    The Insurance Information Institute (III) suggests dropping collision and/or comprehensive insurance on older cars to save money. As a rule of thumb, III says that if your car is worth less than 10 times the premium, it may make sense to drop that coverage.
  • The Bottom Line
    The important thing to recognize is that car insurance should be customized to meet your needs. Consulting with an insurance agent can be the best way to make sure you are taking advantage of every possible discount and that you and your car are still adequately covered. (Continue your insurance education; check out Unique Insurance Policies You Should Consider.)

    Copyright – http://blogs.forbes.com/investopedia/2011/03/11/10-tips-for-getting-the-lowest-car-insurance/

    Forbes – Investopedia       March 11, 2011

    GAO: Flood Program Unsound, Poorly Managed

    February 18th, 2011 | News

    Copyright:  (c) 2011 A.M. Best Company, Inc.
    Source:  A.M. Best Company, Inc.
       

    The National Flood Insurance Program remains structurally unsound and poor management practices are exacerbating its problems, according to a new report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.

    While the NFIP plays an important role in limiting the damage and financial impact of floods, it is in no position to repay $18.5 billion borrowed from the Treasury Department to cover claims from Hurricane Katrina or other 2005 hurricanes, much less future catastrophic losses, according to the GAO report. The NFIP is intended to be funded with premium dollars from policyholders, but as created by Congress and managed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, it is “by design” not a sound operation, the GAO determined.

    “Also, weakness in NFIP management and operations, including financial reporting processes and internal controls, and oversight of contractors place the program at risk,” according to the GAO.

    The NFIP is badly in need of wholesale reforms at its core, said Jimi Grande, senior vice president of federal and political affairs for the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies. Subsidization of rates encourages irresponsible development, Grande said, as does a policy that bars the program from denying insurance on the basis of frequent losses. The GAO report found that just 1% of policies account for 25-30% of claims. The NFIP is subject to other limitations private insurers are not: it cannot build a capital surplus, may not reject high-risk applicants and is subject to statutory limits on rate increases.

    “Until we have rates that match the risk, you’re going to subsidize bad behavior,” he said.

    While the NFIP made the GAO’s annual list of high-risk government operations, as it has since 2006, the picture is not entirely negative, the GAO found. FEMA has taken steps to strengthen the program, including increasing the number of policyholders and implementing a new process for overseeing contractors. FEMA has reduced its Treasury debt by $850,000 since August 2009.

    “Unless these operational and management issues are addressed, FEMA risks ongoing challenges in effectively and efficiently managing NFIP, including its management and use of information, data, and technology,” according to the report.

    The GAO is scheduled to issue a detailed report on management and operational challenges facing the NFIP in March.

    While the NFIP’s troubles are not new, “This report is another important reminder that Congress needs to address the issue and pass a longer-term extension that focuses on the needed fundamental reforms,” American Insurance Association spokesman Blain Rethmeier said.

    The NFIP is authorized only through Sept. 30, and insurers are hoping to avoid the rolling gaps and extensions that characterized 2010. With the electoral defeats of the top Democratic voices for including windstorm coverage in the program, some are optimistic of a long-term deal (BestWire, Dec. 30, 2010). President Barack Obama signed a one-year extension of the NFIP into law after Congress failed to pass comprehensive reauthorization legislation (BestWire, Oct. 1, 2010). Several expirations had caused brief lapses in the flood program.

    (By Sean P. Carr, Washington Bureau Manager: sean.carr@ambest.com)